Media Caught Lying, Version2

Poslao: minivanjack
Opis:
I stumbled on a stunning disconnect between the major media version of election coverage and candidate appearance trends on the internet. The Mainstream Media seems to have largely ignored something major on the web.
This version corrects a minor error in the first version. Note: This video has attracted a lot of attention from hater-trolls so I may block anyone that comes here to make trouble. All respectful and intelligent discussion is welcome.

Tagovi: barack campaign clinton election hillary john lies mccain media obama paul presidential ron

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by minivanjack

Pogledajte još...

Bush Caught Lying About September 11th	Big Media Lies!	Media Caught Lying

All You Should Know For The Presidential Election 2008	Paul Resumes His Campaign: The Revolution: A Manifesto Began. RonPaul's Campaign For Liberty. Rep. Ron Paul's presidential campaign, a pugnacious, ideological crusade against big government interventionist leanings in Republican rally outside GOP	Interview_Trick

Share This Video:

Komentari: Prikaži || Sakrij

Comments for this video on YouTube

Undoubtedly Ron ... ( 1 month ago by VVendettaz)

Undoubtedly Ron Paul should be the President. He is without any shadow of a doubt the only real politician in the world today that understand the concept for the people by the people. Im a UK resident and I wish we had such a politicians, No, what we have are cowards and traitors. harsh words I know, but that's the reality. perhaps the next time around the Ron Paul surge helped by the people will demand coverage. Its easy, turn off your TVs, they will get the message very very fast.

go ron paul ( 1 month ago by wcarlpdrysdale)

go ron paul

Well done man! ... ( 1 month ago by Crazyfish66)

Well done man! Destroy the concentrated media!
Freedom of the press doesnt mean corporations should be the arbiters of "democracy". Their networth screams capitalism first, democracy second.

Array ( 1 month ago by danivonluze)

hits != popularity
people who use the internet a lot != all voters
Is it that difficult?

the problem is the ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

the problem is the number of people who use the internet is a large of enough sample to determine what the people whod on't use the internet think. For example, you are taking a survey in africa, and you ask 80 percent of afriacns what they like, that's a large sample. So 80 percent of the africans you haven't asked, +- some will like the same thing. Now what your saying is illogical, cause what your sayingi s if they use the internet then they are different "africans" than if they don't.

and hits do equal ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

and hits do equal popularity unless 90 percent of those hits in the data above were from accidental clicks, do you want me to approximat ethe probability of that for you? It's akin to getting hit by lightining in outerspace.

Two problems - by ... ( 4 weeks ago by danivonluze)

Two problems - by hit I mean searches. That means people want to find something, but it doesn't mean that they agree with what they find. eg I research the activity of extremist politicians, but not because I like them, because I oppose them. My searches should not be shown as 'support', but by your reasoning they would be.
Secondly, yes, people who heavily use the internet are not typical. The more heavy the usage (and so the more activity they engage in on line), the less typical they are.

Besides, the ... ( 4 weeks ago by danivonluze)

Besides, the African example is not analogous:
1) Surveys are usually conducted against hundreds or possible a thousand or two people, not 80% of the target population.
2) A survey implies an attempt at a random sample with each person getting one set of responses. Internet usage is self-selecting and each user can make multiple searches.
I myself searched for Ron Paul in 2007 as I had no clue who he was. That doesn't mean I support him.
Ron Paul lost. But he got a load of cash ha ha!

not true, where the ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

not true, where the election occured in America, internet users are typical in statistical studies. For example, my grandma uses the internet and fills out polls, so do all 900 of my friends, this means statistically, that in and around teh chicago land area, most people of all ages use the internet.

I said 'heavy' ... ( 4 weeks ago by danivonluze)

I said 'heavy' internet users. You know - geeks and nerds - not just all internet users. It's the multiple use thing that sways any hit/search based 'polling'.
Besides, if Paul really were genuinely popular, then no amount of media bias would have done him in. He'd have at least taken credible results in the GOP polls (if the 'straw polls' from Dec 07 were anything to go by). Perhaps a lot of people read what he had to say, watched the clips, and then concluded he was a nutbar?

so your assuming ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

so your assuming that people who visited the ron paul pages twice were computer geeks? Wow your a stupid fuck cause i know for a fact computer geeks in general care very little about politics...dumb ass.
Second, wrong...hte media decides who gets the exposure, can't know someone before you see them or word of mouth gets to you,a nd word of mouth in the modern world travels by television you dumb fuck. I think they concluded you were a nutbar, that's why i'm the only one answering you.

And btw if Ron Paul ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

And btw if Ron Paul is a nutbar, then how come he is right about the FED? and if he is right and that makes him a nutbar I guess that makes you a gullible cocksucker huh? or your mom has the cock sucking gene? Maybe your father sucks the dicks of twelve year old boys because he is a rich lawyer or doctor? Or perhaps that is you? Nutbur? OR was it you suck nutbar?

And btw if Ron Paul ... ( 4 weeks ago by Isamright33)

There's nothing ... ( 4 weeks ago by danivonluze)

There's nothing like resorting to swearing to win an argument.
First off, by 'geeks and nerds' I didn't exclusively mean computer geeks, I also meant political junkies. I'd go on, but I wonder how much more eloquent you'd get in response.

Who is removing my ... ( 4 weeks ago by minivanjack)

Who is removing my posts?

People are deleting ... ( 3 weeks ago by Turkisstory)

People are deleting your posts? you mean comments? the only people that can do that is YouTube.
And when it comes to covering up the truth, YouTube is the top gun for that.
PS: Are you the guy in the video? Your a genius.

Hold on, I just ... ( 3 weeks ago by Turkisstory)

Hold on, I just noticed something. You posted this 2 days ago, yet it says your last sign in was 6 days ago Hmm... Are you sure your not YouTube?
/thinks.

I regretfully have ... ( 3 weeks ago by erikvdln)

I regretfully have to say "Obama" gives much more hits than "Barack Obama". Still Ron Paul tips above Obama in 2007. Considering the huge difference in media attention Ron Paul should be president.

I can delete ... ( 3 weeks ago by erikvdln)

I can delete replies to my own uploaded videos...

well done!! great ... ( 2 weeks ago by INDAKAZPRODUCTIONS)

well done!! great video, what are you doing about this??

too bad there are ... ( 1 week ago by gatewaynoble)

too bad there are still many idiots out there who just dont fucking get it. i wanna see what the trend has been lately for NWO or illuminati or how about ill type down "fuck the media". the media is a mind control agency that pretty much creates the world we live in , if people just dont get that or think its too corny or its rubbish then go fuck off watch "tell A vision"

It seems like this ... ( 1 week ago by RighteousPaladin)

It seems like this points to the fact that people on the internet are telling the sheep to vote for Ron Paul, and people in the other media are telling the sheep to vote for Obama. I'm not sure I'm down for either choice.

Moral of the story, ... ( 1 week ago by scarlet7888)

Moral of the story,
Its media which is more powerful than internet.

Just because Ron ... ( 10 hours ago by justinpage61)

Just because Ron Paul was looked up on the internet does not mean the people looking him up were going to vote for him.

Smeško

Smešni video, reklame, životinje, političari....da pukneš od smeha

Media Caught Lying, Version2

URL
Embed Code